Founder Interview
How SAFA Is Automating Safety Case Analysis for Safety-Critical Software While Raising a $200K SAFE Round (Interview with CEO Aarik Gulaya)
- Interview Date
- April 13, 2022
- Interviewee
- Aarik GulayaCEO
Company Metrics at Interview Time
Hard Committed (April 2022)
$125,000
Team Size (2022)
6 people
Notre Dame Equity Stake (2022)
20%
Historical Snapshot
These numbers were reported by Aarik Gulaya during the interview recorded in April 2022 and are a historical snapshot, not current figures. See SAFA’s current numbers.

Key Takeaways
- 01SAFA is a Notre Dame spinout automating safety case analysis for safety-critical software in automotive, robotics, medical devices, and aerospace.
- 02The company is pre-revenue at the time of the interview in April 2022.
- 03SAFA is raising a $200,000 SAFE round with $125,000 hard committed and $25,000 soft committed, leaving $50,000 outstanding.
- 04Notre Dame will retain a 20% equity stake in the spinout plus a nominal license fee.
- 05CEO Aarik Gulaya holds approximately 10% equity, with the lead engineer and professor each holding about 9%.
- 06The team has six people, all part-time at the time of the interview.
- 07SAFA is targeting a beta program in Q2 or Q3 2022 and a full product release in Q1 2023.
- 08LHP Engineering, a potential development partner in the automotive industry, has soft committed $25,000 to the SAFE round.
- 09SAFA differentiates from IBM Doors and Jama Software through machine learning, deep learning, and native safety standards support built into the platform.
- 10Aarik Gulaya was brought on specifically to commercialize the technology developed over 20-plus years by Professor Jane Cleland-Huang at Notre Dame.
Company Metrics at Time of Interview
| Metric | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| SAFE Round Hard Committed (April 2022) | $125,000 | Founder interview, April 2022 |
| SAFE Round Soft Committed (April 2022) | $25,000 | Founder interview, April 2022 |
| SAFE Round Outstanding (April 2022) | $50,000 | Founder interview, April 2022 |
| Team Size (2022) | 6 people | Founder interview, April 2022 |
| Notre Dame Equity Stake (2022) | 20% | Founder interview, April 2022 |
| CEO Equity Stake (2022) | 10% | Founder interview, April 2022 |
| Professor Jane Cleland-Huang Equity Stake (2022) | 9% | Founder interview, April 2022 |
| Lead Engineer Alberto Equity Stake (2022) | 9% | Founder interview, April 2022 |
| AI Engineer Jin Feng Equity Stake (2022) | 2% | Founder interview, April 2022 |
| LHP Engineering Soft Commitment to SAFE (April 2022) | $25,000 | Founder interview, April 2022 |
| IBM Doors Enterprise Starting Price (competitor, cited in talk) (2022) | $50,000 | Founder interview, April 2022 |
| IBM Doors Per-User Seat Price Range (competitor, cited in talk) (2022) | $500 to $1,600 | Founder interview, April 2022 |
Growth Breakdown
Revenue
SAFA is pre-revenue at the time of the interview. The company is targeting a beta program in Q2 or Q3 2022 with discounted pricing, and expects its first paying customers in Q1 2023 at a full license fee.
Customers
SAFA has no paying customers yet. The team is in talks with two to three development partners, including LHP Engineering in the automotive industry and two smaller companies in the robotics and agri-tech fields.
Team
The company has six part-time team members at the time of the interview, including a lead front-end engineer, a lead engineer, and an AI engineer. No full-time employees have been hired yet.
Funding
SAFA is raising a $200,000 SAFE round with a $2,000,000 cap and a 20% discount. At the time of the interview, $125,000 is hard committed, $25,000 is soft committed from LHP Engineering, and $50,000 remains outstanding. The round is expected to close by the end of the following month.
Growth Strategy
University Spinout and IP Licensing
SAFA is commercializing over 20 years of research from Professor Jane Cleland-Huang at Notre Dame, giving the company a deep technical foundation in traceability and natural language processing. Notre Dame retains a 20% equity stake and receives a nominal license fee in exchange for the IP.
Development Partner Pipeline
Rather than pursuing cold sales, SAFA is building relationships with two to three development partners who will help validate the product and refine advanced features. LHP Engineering in the automotive industry is the lead partner and has soft committed $25,000 to the SAFE round.
Differentiation Through Machine Learning
SAFA differentiates from established competitors like IBM Doors and Jama Software by automating the manual linking of documentation through deep learning and natural language processing, reducing the engineering burden of safety case analysis.
Native Safety Standards Integration
SAFA plans to embed safety standards directly into the platform, removing the need for engineers to memorize complex certification requirements. According to Aarik Gulaya, this native standard support is not offered by IBM Doors or Jama Software and can accelerate the speed to safety certification.
Staged Beta and Full Release Roadmap
The company is following a staged go-to-market plan: a beta program in Q2 or Q3 2022 with discounted pricing, followed by a full product release in Q1 2023. This approach allows SAFA to gather real-world feedback before committing to full commercial pricing.
Best Quotes
“Yeah, so safety critical software, specifically we can look at a few different industries, the automotive industry, robotics industry, medical devices, and aerospace. Essentially, these are exceptionally complex systems and they're dealing with humans in many cases, either in the transportation of them or they're working around them. So in any case where a failure can happen in the operation of that software that may harm a human, we can consider that a safety critical software.”
“I was brought on specifically to commercialize this technology into a standalone spinout from the university.”
“currently we are a 100% Notre Dame wholly owned, but in the next month, month and a half, we will be spinning out the company and Notre Dame will have a 20% stake in terms of the idea center. Then we'll also be paying a nominal license fee to the University of Notre Dame.”
“So currently we're looking at $200,000 at a two million dollar cap, 20% discount. We have 125 ks of that hard committed, 25 soft committed. We have 50,000 outstanding currently.”
“So the biggest and most obvious is the machine learning and deep learning aspect of it. So these are great tools. We're not going to knock against them, but essentially they provide a blank slate for companies to come into and create all of their documentation, link all of this documentation together and provide change analysis that way. Where Safa is differentiated is within that application of deep learning and natural language processing.”
“if we can provide them this type of support within the platform, we can increase that speed to safety certification.”
“we're looking at a beta program in about Q2 or Q3 of twenty twenty two. And then we're looking at a full release in Q1 of twenty twenty four or 2023, sorry, my mistake. So we'll probably be looking at that first paying candidate within that beta program.”
What Happened Next
This interview captured SAFA at a very early stage in April 2022, when the company was pre-revenue, raising its first $200,000 SAFE round, and preparing to spin out of Notre Dame. The figures and plans described here reflect what Aarik Gulaya reported at that point in time and are not current. Visit the SAFA company profile on GetLatka for the latest available data on revenue, funding, and team growth.
View SAFA’s current profile and metricsFull Transcript
Chapters
- 0:00Introduction and What SAFA Does
- 0:56Pricing and Competitor Benchmarks
- 1:31First Line of Code and University Origins
- 2:03Spinning Out of Notre Dame
- 2:51Notre Dame Equity Stake and License Fee
- 3:09Cap Table Breakdown
- 7:09Why Aarik Joined Instead of Starting Fresh
- 7:25First Customers and Development Partners
- 8:24Path to First Paid Customer
- 9:25Pricing Model and Metrics
- 9:53Differentiation from IBM Doors and Jama Software
- 10:56Team Size and Structure
- 11:43SAFE Round Details and Fundraising Progress
- 12:15Famous Five
- 13:20Closing Thoughts
Introduction and What SAFA Does
Nathan Latka
00:00Hey, folks. My guest today is Aarik Gulaya. He's the CEO of SAFA, a b to b SaaS company automating the safety analysis process for safety critical software. Aarik, you ready to take us to the top?
Aarik Gulaya
00:10>> Yeah. Yeah. Most definitely. What's an example of safety critical software? Yeah, so safety critical software, specifically we can look at a few different industries, the automotive industry, robotics industry, medical devices, and aerospace. Essentially, these are exceptionally complex systems and they're dealing with humans in many cases, either in the transportation of them or they're working around them. So in any case where a failure can happen in the operation of that software that may harm a human, we
00:41>> can consider that a safety critical software.
Nathan Latka
00:43So you might sell to Delta Airlines and the software that runs the planes that they have to check right before every every takeoff?
Aarik Gulaya
00:49>> Yeah. Yeah. In theory, Delta Airlines could could use our product for for any of their safety case development around their planes.
Pricing and Competitor Benchmarks
Nathan Latka
00:56Interesting. Okay. And so how do you price this thing? What's the average customer paying per year?
Aarik Gulaya
01:00>> Yeah. So currently, we're pre revenue and very early stage. So when we're looking at pricing, we're typically using competitor pricing. So we were looking at IBM Doors, Jama Software. These are very large requirements management softwares in the space. For reference there, IBM Doors can start at $50,000 for an enterprise application. Then they'll charge any additional user seats. Typically this ranges from $500 to $1,600 and then any additional functionality and add ons coming
01:29>> in for whatever price they may put that at.
First Line of Code and University Origins
Nathan Latka
01:31So you're building, you're building, you're building. When did you write the first line of code? This year, last year, sometime else?
Aarik Gulaya
01:38>> I guess to give a little background, we've been working with a professor at the University of Notre Dame. Her name is Doctor Jane Cleland-Huang. And she's been working on traceability, specifically automating that process for the last twenty plus years. So if she was here, she'd probably say she started in early two thousands trying to figure this problem out.
Nathan Latka
02:00You guys though joining the team was last year?
Spinning Out of Notre Dame
Aarik Gulaya
02:03>> Yes. I was brought on specifically to commercialize this technology into a standalone spinout from the university.
Nathan Latka
02:09Yeah. So this is always we get this a lot with founders. I remember when I was at Virginia Tech trying to spin IP out of the university's research lab was a nightmare because they just had very archaic terms around ownership and all this kind of stuff. So is Notre Dame friendly here? How much equity does Notre Dame own in SAFA?
Aarik Gulaya
02:25>> Yeah. So we're we're working directly with the idea center at Notre Dame. They're their, you know, entrepreneurship center. They've typically the classic process is sort of just to license IP out to larger corporations. And then, in some cases that research may or may not come to light. In this case, we were attempting to build a startup within Notre Dame. So currently we are a 100% Notre Dame wholly owned, but in the next month, month and a
Notre Dame Equity Stake and License Fee
Aarik Gulaya
02:51>> half, we will be spinning out the company and Notre Dame will have a 20% stake in terms of the idea center. Then we'll also be paying a nominal license fee to the University of Notre Dame.
Nathan Latka
03:03Yeah, okay, got it, got it. Plus license fee. And then what does that leave for you, the professor and any other co founders?
Cap Table Breakdown
Aarik Gulaya
03:09>> Yeah, so we've sort of set aside for now in terms of first round investment, a seed round or something like that, as well as an employee options pool around the 40 to 50% of that equity table or that cap table. In terms of what goes to everyone else, Jane is going to be keeping like about a 9% equity stake. Alberto, who is our lead engineer, another 9%. Myself will be at 10%. And then we have our
03:41>> AI engineer Jin Feng who will have 2% as well.
Nathan Latka
03:45Interesting. Okay. So between Jane, the lead engineer, you, the lead AI engineer, you guys altogether on 50%. Right?
Aarik Gulaya
03:52>> Just a a little bit under. Yeah.
Nathan Latka
03:54A little
Aarik Gulaya
03:55>> bit under, which we've gotten pushed back on.
Nathan Latka
03:58Oh, what's going on there, YouTube? Good to see you guys. Now imagine this. You love watching these interviews with SaaS founders. But imagine if we took all of the valuation data out from over 2,807 interviews I've done manually saves you a lot of time. Well, we've done this, we've built it into the beautiful interface inside of Founderpath. Check this out. I'll show you how you can access this in a second. But you log in, you connect
04:22your Stripe account, you see your valuation real time, you can see what changed over the past eighty eight days and even set goals for valuation this year. Now the secret evaluation is there's many different ways to value a SaaS business. So the reason you're gonna see three or four different valuations inside of your Founderpath dashboard, this is all free by the way, is because depending on who's doing the buying of your SaaS company, you're gonna get
04:46a different valuation. A VC is gonna pay a different valuation, Private equity firm is different. If you're gonna do a minority sale, that's different. And if you sell the whole business, that's a different valuation. You can see all those when I hover over here. Right? So the teal is what a VC would pay. Yellow is what private equity and red is if you sold the whole thing outright. Now what's cool about this is this is not
05:08built off random data. Again, you guys hear these interviews on YouTube. All these datas are built from real time valuation data points founder share with us on the show. So traction 1,200,000 seed round 3.7 raise. They sold 22% of their business. Go in here and filter by the event. Maybe you only wanna see companies that have sold the whole business. Well, here are a bunch that have been acquired the valuation and the multiple. Maybe you're going
05:34out right now and you're raising your seed round. We'll go in here and look at all this recent seed deals that went down, what they raised, what valuation they raised at and what percent that they sold. There's never been a larger dataset of SaaS valuations than what you can get now inside of Founderpath. And we're thrilled to bring it to you. All right. We're gonna go back to the YouTube video here in a second. But if
05:56you wanna check this tool out, if you wanna jump in and sign up, you can check it out for free to get your valuation at this link, this link, founderpath.com/products/valuations. Or if you go to founderpath.com and hover over products, click on get your valuation here, and go ahead and sign up to give it a whirl. Again, all that valuation data live right inside the platform. I hope to see you there. Alright. Let's jump back into the
06:22interview. Yeah. And then the an an investor put some capital on their own, some above that. Notre Dame will keep 20% and that's how you're planning. Yep. Yep. Okay. Interesting. I guess why do guy like you, you're bright, you're sharp, you can commercialize. Why get in a mess like this? Why not just launch something yourself from scratch and own a 100%?
Aarik Gulaya
06:39>> Yeah. Yeah. So I mean, it it really was, I guess, a happy accident or whatever you want to call it, an event of chaos, where I happened to interview for a random position looking at Founder Associates for this university research, Do you have the skills or the background to essentially commercialize this technology? For me, it's just quite a phenomenal piece of technology. The natural language processing models and deep learning models that we're applying to this problem
Why Aarik Joined Instead of Starting Fresh
Aarik Gulaya
07:09>> are exceptionally generalizable. So on my own end, I've looked at starting separate companies around natural language processing and it just seemed like a better fit for me and my skills for something that we can expand into many industries for.
First Customers and Development Partners
Nathan Latka
07:25So you're in charge of commercialization, who's going to be your first customer?
Aarik Gulaya
07:29>> Yeah, so right now, you know, we're finishing up our MVP and I know that term is used very broadly, this will be somewhat of a more put together first product offering, if you will. We're currently looking at two to three development partners that we're going to be starting within the next month to month and a half. One of those is LHP Engineering. We're currently in talks about what will that potential partnership look like? How can we
07:52>> add to their process? They work specifically within the automotive industry and will be helping us with some implementation for some of our more advanced features. And then we're looking at two other smaller companies that work in the robotics field, specifically within agri tech and mobile robotics.
Nathan Latka
08:08So is LHP engineering going to be paying you for this?
Aarik Gulaya
08:11>> So LHP engineering is actually going to, right now we're discussing them coming in on our safe round. So they would come in for potentially they've soft committed to $25,000 So,
Path to First Paid Customer
Aarik Gulaya
08:24>> I guess technically we won't consider that payment. We may have them pay us a nominal amount in order to say it's a paid pilot, but moving forward, the other pilot partners will be paying us in.
Nathan Latka
08:35And so when do you think you can get your first paid customer spun up, right? You refresh the BB and T or Chase bank account and woah, there's 50 ks there.
Aarik Gulaya
08:43>> Yeah. Yeah. So right now, at least the way that the product roadmap is turning out, we're looking at a beta program in about Q2 or Q3 of twenty twenty two. And then we're looking at a full release in Q1 of twenty twenty four or 2023, sorry, my mistake. So we'll probably be looking at that first paying candidate within that beta program. Obviously, that'll be a discounted fee in terms of what a full license fee or licensed
09:11>> customer will look like. We'll probably see that in Q1 of twenty twenty three.
Nathan Latka
09:15What are you learning right now as you talk and have commercialization conversations? What can you price against? Is it sort of number of software runs or tests completed in a certain month or what's the metric?
Pricing Model and Metrics
Aarik Gulaya
09:25>> Yeah, so that's an option. It's an option that we're sort of open to. The traditional way we've seen pricing in this industry is how many users are actually on the platform. So within an engineering team, do you have 10 people who would be interacting with this platform, 20 people? And typically that's how IBM Doors and Jama software price their price their offering as well.
Nathan Latka
09:46Mhmm. And why what are you guys doing uniquely different than than than those two companies, IBM Doors and Jama software?
Differentiation from IBM Doors and Jama Software
Aarik Gulaya
09:53>> Yeah. Yeah. So the biggest and most obvious is the machine learning and deep learning aspect of it. So these are great tools. We're not going to knock against them, but essentially they provide a blank slate for companies to come into and create all of their documentation, link all of this documentation together and provide change analysis that way. Where Safa is differentiated is within that application of deep learning and natural language processing. So as opposed to having
10:20>> an engineer having to manually go through and link all of these things together, We can automate that process, partially automate it so that we can speed that up. In terms of change analysis, we're able to better understand how one change in a part of a complex system affects a top level requirement or something like this. And then finally, we're also looking at integrating safety standards directly into the platform, sort of native standard support, which IBM Doors
10:44>> and Jama, they don't provide this. Engineers typically need to know this like the back of their hand, But if we can provide them this type of support within the platform, we can increase that speed to safety certification.
Team Size and Structure
Nathan Latka
10:56Very cool. How many folks are on the team today full time?
Aarik Gulaya
10:59>> Yeah, so full time, we currently we technically don't have any full time employees at the company, but we do have our lead front end engineer, our lead engineer.
Nathan Latka
11:11We have two So I guess how many are how many are part time total?
Aarik Gulaya
11:15>> Yeah. Yeah. So four. About six, six people. Six. Yeah.
Nathan Latka
11:19And so because you're still waiting on MVP to get done, are you in charge of raising the safe round as head of commercialization?
Aarik Gulaya
11:24>> Yes. Yes. That is handle all of the business side in terms of setting up the websites, getting all of the product market fit validation into place, any infrastructure we may need. And then finally also interfacing with VCs and getting that funding.
Nathan Latka
11:40And so how much are you going to raise?
SAFE Round Details and Fundraising Progress
Aarik Gulaya
11:43>> So currently we're looking at $200,000 at a two million dollar cap, 20% discount. We have 125 ks of that hard committed, 25 soft committed. We have 50,000 outstanding currently.
Nathan Latka
11:56Very cool. And so when do you think that'll close?
Aarik Gulaya
11:58>> We're looking to close that at the end of next month that we should have everyone in. And I'm currently meeting weekly with people to drum up interest.
Nathan Latka
12:10Well, you're off to the races, Aarik. It's gonna be fun to watch. You have to come in six months and twelve months, give us an update. Okay?
Famous Five
Aarik Gulaya
12:15>> Yeah. Yeah.
Nathan Latka
12:15Would be awesome. Before we wrap up, let's chat through the famous five here. Number one, favorite business book.
Aarik Gulaya
12:21>> Favorite business book.
12:24>> It's kind of a cop out, Start With Why.
Nathan Latka
12:27Number two, is there a CEO you're following or studying?
Aarik Gulaya
12:32>> Masayoshi san, even though I wouldn't really consider him as much of a CEO, but more of a holdings, I guess SoftBank's more of a holdings company now, but yep.
Nathan Latka
12:41Number three, what's your favorite online tool for building the business?
Aarik Gulaya
12:46>> Notion.
Nathan Latka
12:47Number four, how many hours of sleep do get every night?
Aarik Gulaya
12:52>> Five to six.
Nathan Latka
12:53Okay. And what's your situation? Married, single, kids?
Aarik Gulaya
12:56>> Sing or well, I'm not single. I'm I'm in a relationship. Long term No kids. I'm married. Yeah. No kids.
Nathan Latka
13:03Alright.
13:04How old are you, Aarik?
Aarik Gulaya
13:05>> I am 27 years old.
13:07>> 27.
Nathan Latka
13:08Last question. Something you wish you when you were 20.
Aarik Gulaya
13:15>> If you give your all to something, it will work out. Don't don't stress out about it.
Closing Thoughts
Nathan Latka
13:20Guys, there you have it. Safa.ai, Notre Dame's spinout. And in case you're not familiar with how those spinouts work, you know, they're anticipating Notre Dame will own about 20% of the IP. The professor that developed it own about 9%. Aarik in charge of commercialization will own, call it 10%. And then some key engineers and all their employees own 20% to 30% in addition to the investors coming in on their $200,000 safe right now that they're closing
13:40on a 2,000,000 cap. We hope they can get it done. They're building software that helps safety critical infrastructure manage and make sure testing's working, competing directly with IBM Doors and Jama software. We'll see what happens next. Aarik, thanks for taking us to top.
Aarik Gulaya
13:52>> Cool. Thank you, Nathan.
Nathan Latka
13:55One more thing before you go. We have a brand new show every Thursday at 1PM Central. It's called Shark Tank for SaaS. We call it deal or bust. One founder comes on, three hungry buyers, they try and do a deal live and the founder shares back end dashboards, their expenses, their revenue, ARPU, CAC, LTV, you name it, they share it and the buyers try and make a deal live. It is fun to watch every Thursday 1PM
14:20Central. Additionally, remember these recorded founder interviews go live. We release them here on YouTube every day at 2PM Central. To make sure you don't miss any of that, make sure you click the subscribe button below here on YouTube, the big red button and then click the little bell notification to make sure you get notifications when we do go live. I wouldn't want you to miss breaking news in the SaaS world, whether it's an acquisition, a big
14:42fundraise, a big sale, a big profitability statement or something else. I don't want you to miss it. Additionally, if you want to take this conversation deeper and further, we have by far the largest private Slack community for B2B SaaS founders. You want to get in there. We've probably talked about your tool if you're running a company or your firm if you're investing. You can go in there and quickly search and see what people are saying. Sign
15:04up for that @nathanlatka.comslashslack. In the meantime, I'm hanging out with you here on YouTube. I'll be in the comments for the next thirty minutes. Feel free to let me know what you thought about this episode and if you enjoyed it, click the thumbs up. We get a lot of haters that are mad at how aggressive I am on these shows, but I do it so that we can all learn. We have to counter those people. We
15:23got to push them away. Click the thumbs up below to counter them and know that I appreciate your guys'support. Alright, I'll be in the comments. See you.