Simplesdesk vs Zima Blue Software AI: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
Simplesdesk generates $330K in revenue; Zima Blue Software AI generates $330K. Simplesdesk and Zima Blue Software AI are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Simplesdesk and Zima Blue Software AI on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company |  SimplesdeskThis company |  Zima Blue Software AI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $330K | $330K |
| Team size | 3 | 3 |
| Founded | Not disclosed | 2019 |
| HQ | São Paulo, Brazil | Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
Simplesdesk at a glance
Simplesdesk generates $330K in revenue with 3 employees, headquartered in São Paulo, Brazil.
- Revenue
- $330K
- Team size
- 3
Plataforma de atendimento com integração nativa com o Chatgpt, Google Gemini, Claude, Google Sheets, Google Calendar e mais 2.000 automações via Make ou Zapier - Whitelabel disponível
Zima Blue Software AI at a glance
Zima Blue Software AI generates $330K in revenue with 3 employees, headquartered in Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
- Revenue
- $330K
- Team size
- 3
- Founded
- 2019
Pioneering Advanced Software Solutions: Innovate, Automate, and Elevate Your Business Success
Other Simplesdesk alternatives
Simplesdesk competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
Simplesdesk vs Zima Blue Software AI: frequently asked questions
Is Simplesdesk or Zima Blue Software AI bigger?
Simplesdesk is the bigger company by revenue, at $330K against $330K for Zima Blue Software AI.
How much revenue does Simplesdesk make?
Simplesdesk generates $330K in annual revenue with a team of 3.
How much revenue does Zima Blue Software AI make?
Zima Blue Software AI generates $330K in annual revenue with a team of 3.