Latka logo

Siteface vs SPHARES: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

Siteface generates $252.1K in revenue; SPHARES generates $254K. SPHARES and Siteface are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Siteface and SPHARES on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

Siteface vs SPHARES compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanySiteface logoSitefaceThis companySPHARES logoSPHARES
Revenue$252.1K$254K
ValuationNot disclosed$1.8M
Team size92
Founded20102013
HQBelo Horizonte, BrazilVienna, Austria

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

Siteface logo

Siteface at a glance

Siteface generates $252.1K in revenue with 9 employees, headquartered in Belo Horizonte, Brazil.

Revenue
$252.1K
Team size
9
Founded
2010

Siteface is a SaaS-based solution that enables users to create websites and blogs for their small- and medium-sized businesses.

SPHARES logo

SPHARES at a glance

SPHARES generates $254K in revenue with 2 employees, headquartered in Vienna, Austria.

Revenue
$254K
Valuation
$1.8M
Team size
2
Founded
2013

Developer of an online collaboration platform for businesses. The company provides a unified collaboration and integration platform for businesses and their partners that connects company's business and productivity services to those of…

Other Siteface alternatives

Siteface competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

Siteface vs SPHARES: frequently asked questions

Is Siteface or SPHARES bigger?

SPHARES is the bigger company by revenue, at $254K against $252.1K for Siteface.

How much revenue does Siteface make?

Siteface generates $252.1K in annual revenue with a team of 9.

How much revenue does SPHARES make?

SPHARES generates $254K in annual revenue with a team of 2.