Latka logo

SiteScarf vs Workhuman: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

SiteScarf has not disclosed its revenue; Workhuman generates $1.2B. The table below compares SiteScarf and Workhuman on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

SiteScarf vs Workhuman compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanySiteScarf logoSiteScarfThis companyWorkhuman logoWorkhuman
RevenueNot disclosed$1.2B
ValuationNot disclosed$1.2B
Funding raisedNot disclosed$139.6M
CustomersNot disclosed280
Team sizeNot disclosed1K
GrowthNot disclosed1.8%
FoundedNot disclosed1999
HQUnited StatesFramingham, United States

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

SiteScarf logo

SiteScarf at a glance

SiteScarf simplifies your marketing efforts by ensuring that your communication is not only timely but also uniform across all channels. It allows users to share updates and announcements seamlessly across multiple sites.

Workhuman logo

Workhuman at a glance

Workhuman generates $1.2B in revenue with 1K employees, headquartered in Framingham, United States.

Revenue
$1.2B
Valuation
$1.2B
Funding
$139.6M
Customers
280
Team size
1K
Founded
1999

Workhuman is a technology company that provides a social recognition and continuous performance management platform. Its cloud-based software aims to help organizations create a more positive, inclusive, and productive work culture by…

Other SiteScarf alternatives

SiteScarf competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

SiteScarf vs Workhuman: frequently asked questions

How much revenue does Workhuman make?

Workhuman generates $1.2B in annual revenue with a team of 1K.

How much funding has Workhuman raised?

Workhuman has raised $139.6M in total funding since it was founded in 1999.