FKW vs Skimlinks: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
FKW generates $12.3M in revenue; Skimlinks generates $12.2M. FKW and Skimlinks are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares FKW and Skimlinks on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company |  FKWThis company |  Skimlinks |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $12.3M | $12.2M |
| Team size | 86 | 111 |
| Founded | 2010 | 2007 |
| HQ | Guangzhou, China | London, United Kingdom |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
FKW at a glance
FKW generates $12.3M in revenue with 86 employees, headquartered in Guangzhou, China.
- Revenue
- $12.3M
- Team size
- 86
- Founded
- 2010
FKW is a SaaS platform that provides internet marketing services.
Skimlinks at a glance
Skimlinks generates $12.2M in revenue with 111 employees, headquartered in London, United Kingdom.
- Revenue
- $12.2M
- Team size
- 111
- Founded
- 2007
Skimlinks powers commerce content strategies for publishers. As the world’s largest commerce content monetisation platform, it helps grow a revenue stream that can contribute as much as a quarter of a publisher’s overall revenue, which…
Other FKW alternatives
FKW competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
FKW vs Skimlinks: frequently asked questions
Is FKW or Skimlinks bigger?
FKW is the bigger company by revenue, at $12.3M against $12.2M for Skimlinks.
How much revenue does FKW make?
FKW generates $12.3M in annual revenue with a team of 86.
How much revenue does Skimlinks make?
Skimlinks generates $12.2M in annual revenue with a team of 111.