Latka logo

Odessa vs SmartAsset: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

Odessa generates $262.6M in revenue; SmartAsset generates $200M. Odessa is 1.3× bigger than SmartAsset by revenue. The table below compares Odessa and SmartAsset on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

Odessa vs SmartAsset compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyOdessa logoOdessaThis companySmartAsset logoSmartAsset
Revenue$262.6M$200M
ValuationNot disclosed$1B
Funding raisedNot disclosed$157.6M
Team size1.4K282
Founded1999Not disclosed
HQPhiladelphia, United StatesNew York, United States

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

Odessa logo

Odessa at a glance

Odessa generates $262.6M in revenue with 1.4K employees, headquartered in Philadelphia, United States.

Revenue
$262.6M
Team size
1.4K
Founded
1999

Leasing industry software company providing loan origination and portfolio-management solutions to some of the largest global brands

SmartAsset logo

SmartAsset at a glance

SmartAsset generates $200M in revenue with 282 employees, headquartered in New York, United States.

Revenue
$200M
Valuation
$1B
Funding
$157.6M
Team size
282

Marketplace connecting consumers to financial advisors

Other Odessa alternatives

Odessa competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

Odessa vs SmartAsset: frequently asked questions

Is Odessa or SmartAsset bigger?

Odessa is the bigger company by revenue, at $262.6M against $200M for SmartAsset.

How much revenue does Odessa make?

Odessa generates $262.6M in annual revenue with a team of 1.4K.

How much revenue does SmartAsset make?

SmartAsset generates $200M in annual revenue with a team of 282.

How much funding has SmartAsset raised?

SmartAsset has raised $157.6M in total funding.