Latka logo

1Check vs StartHQ: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

1Check generates $143.8K in revenue; StartHQ generates $138.6K. 1Check and StartHQ are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares 1Check and StartHQ on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

1Check vs StartHQ compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
Company1Check logo1CheckThis companyStartHQ logoStartHQ
Revenue$143.8K$138.6K
Team size152
Founded20122010
HQNice, FranceFinland

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

1Check logo

1Check at a glance

1Check generates $143.8K in revenue with 15 employees, headquartered in Nice, France.

Revenue
$143.8K
Team size
15
Founded
2012

1Check is an innovative SaaS platform and mobile application designed to transform operations management in the hospitality sector. Founded in 2012 by industry experts, this specialized solution addresses the specific needs of…

StartHQ logo

StartHQ at a glance

StartHQ generates $138.6K in revenue with 2 employees, headquartered in Finland.

Revenue
$138.6K
Team size
2
Founded
2010

Provider of an application launcher and a web application directory. The company offers a web application directory, making it easy for organizations to find the right web application to get their job done. It helps other companies and…

Other 1Check alternatives

1Check competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

1Check vs StartHQ: frequently asked questions

Is 1Check or StartHQ bigger?

1Check is the bigger company by revenue, at $143.8K against $138.6K for StartHQ.

How much revenue does 1Check make?

1Check generates $143.8K in annual revenue with a team of 15.

How much revenue does StartHQ make?

StartHQ generates $138.6K in annual revenue with a team of 2.