Latka logo

The DarkStar Group vs Stellar: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

The DarkStar Group generates $6M in revenue; Stellar generates $6M. The DarkStar Group and Stellar are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares The DarkStar Group and Stellar on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

The DarkStar Group vs Stellar compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyThe DarkStar Group logoThe DarkStar GroupThis companyStellar logoStellar
Revenue$6M$6M
Team size383
Founded20132022
HQSt. Petersburg, United StatesSan Francisco, United States

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

The DarkStar Group logo

The DarkStar Group at a glance

The DarkStar Group generates $6M in revenue with 38 employees, headquartered in St. Petersburg, United States.

Revenue
$6M
Team size
38
Founded
2013

Provides artificial intelligence/machine learning, data science/data engineering, software development, cloud infrastructure, devops, cyber engineering, and cyber defense solutions to the federal government

Stellar logo

Stellar at a glance

Stellar generates $6M in revenue with 3 employees, headquartered in San Francisco, United States.

Revenue
$6M
Team size
3
Founded
2022

AI-powered business goals

Other The DarkStar Group alternatives

The DarkStar Group competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

The DarkStar Group vs Stellar: frequently asked questions

Is The DarkStar Group or Stellar bigger?

The DarkStar Group is the bigger company by revenue, at $6M against $6M for Stellar.

How much revenue does The DarkStar Group make?

The DarkStar Group generates $6M in annual revenue with a team of 38.

How much revenue does Stellar make?

Stellar generates $6M in annual revenue with a team of 3.