Latka logo

Stream vs VedaMed: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

Last updated

Stream generates $4.8M in revenue; VedaMed generates $5M. VedaMed and Stream are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Stream and VedaMed on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

Stream vs VedaMed compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyStream logoStreamThis companyVedaMed logoVedaMed
Revenue$4.8M$5M
ValuationNot disclosed$40M
Team size327
Founded20221985
HQSan Francisco, United StatesDenver, United States

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

Stream logo

Stream at a glance

Stream generates $4.8M in revenue with 32 employees, headquartered in San Francisco, United States.

Revenue
$4.8M
Team size
32
Founded
2022

AI-Powered Medical Document Review for Workers' Comp

VedaMed logo

VedaMed at a glance

VedaMed generates $5M in revenue with 7 employees, headquartered in Denver, United States.

Revenue
$5M
Valuation
$40M
Team size
7
Founded
1985

Provider of a medical billing and coding platform to healthcare providers and hospitals. The company offers cloud electronic medical records, claim processing, revenue cycle, document and practice management software.

Other Stream alternatives

Stream competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

Stream vs VedaMed: frequently asked questions

Is Stream or VedaMed bigger?

VedaMed is the bigger company by revenue, at $5M against $4.8M for Stream.

How much revenue does Stream make?

Stream generates $4.8M in annual revenue with a team of 32.

How much revenue does VedaMed make?

VedaMed generates $5M in annual revenue with a team of 7.