EquipmentShare vs Tetra: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
EquipmentShare generates $2.3B in revenue; Tetra has not disclosed its revenue. The table below compares EquipmentShare and Tetra on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.3B | Not disclosed |
| Team size | 3K | Not disclosed |
| Founded | 2014 | 2019 |
| HQ | Columbia, United States | Los Angeles, United States |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
EquipmentShare at a glance
EquipmentShare generates $2.3B in revenue with 3K employees, headquartered in Columbia, United States.
- Revenue
- $2.3B
- Team size
- 3K
- Founded
- 2014
Cloud solutions for the construction industry.
Tetra at a glance
- Founded
- 2019
Tetra provides solutions to sync and automate data across various applications.
Other EquipmentShare alternatives
EquipmentShare competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
EquipmentShare vs Tetra: frequently asked questions
How much revenue does EquipmentShare make?
EquipmentShare generates $2.3B in annual revenue with a team of 3K.