Latka logo

Feng Office vs Theneo: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

Feng Office generates $3.4M in revenue; Theneo generates $3.5M. Theneo and Feng Office are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Feng Office and Theneo on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

Feng Office vs Theneo compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyFeng Office logoFeng OfficeThis companyTheneo logoTheneo
Revenue$3.4M$3.5M
Valuation$24MNot disclosed
Customers1MNot disclosed
Team size3023
Founded20082022
HQMontevideo, UruguaySan Francisco, United States

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

Feng Office logo

Feng Office at a glance

Feng Office generates $3.4M in revenue with 30 employees, headquartered in Montevideo, Uruguay.

Revenue
$3.4M
Valuation
$24M
Customers
1M
Team size
30
Founded
2008

Feng Office is a user friendly Web-based collaboration software (web office) aimed to enhance group productivity. It features a combination of project management, web document management and CRM functionalities, that enable real-time…

Theneo logo

Theneo at a glance

Theneo generates $3.5M in revenue with 23 employees, headquartered in San Francisco, United States.

Revenue
$3.5M
Team size
23
Founded
2022

Stripe-like API Docs in just a few clicks

Other Feng Office alternatives

Feng Office competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

Feng Office vs Theneo: frequently asked questions

Is Feng Office or Theneo bigger?

Theneo is the bigger company by revenue, at $3.5M against $3.4M for Feng Office.

How much revenue does Feng Office make?

Feng Office generates $3.4M in annual revenue with a team of 30.

How much revenue does Theneo make?

Theneo generates $3.5M in annual revenue with a team of 23.