Latka logo

Lets Rent vs Trader Jack: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

Lets Rent generates $204.3K in revenue; Trader Jack generates $109K. Lets Rent is 1.9× bigger than Trader Jack by revenue. The table below compares Lets Rent and Trader Jack on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

Lets Rent vs Trader Jack compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyLets Rent logoLets RentThis companyTrader Jack logoTrader Jack
Revenue$204.3K$109K
Valuation$1MNot disclosed
Team size42
Founded20132017
HQManchester, United KingdomTempe, United States

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

Lets Rent logo

Lets Rent at a glance

Lets Rent generates $204.3K in revenue with 4 employees, headquartered in Manchester, United Kingdom.

Revenue
$204.3K
Valuation
$1M
Team size
4
Founded
2013

Operator of an online property rental platform. The company offers a cloud based letting platform to the landlords that helps in renting their property to the prospective customers.

Trader Jack logo

Trader Jack at a glance

Trader Jack generates $109K in revenue with 2 employees, headquartered in Tempe, United States.

Revenue
$109K
Team size
2
Founded
2017

Online platform to automate property management for both vacation rental owners and service providers.

Other Lets Rent alternatives

Lets Rent competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

Lets Rent vs Trader Jack: frequently asked questions

Is Lets Rent or Trader Jack bigger?

Lets Rent is the bigger company by revenue, at $204.3K against $109K for Trader Jack.

How much revenue does Lets Rent make?

Lets Rent generates $204.3K in annual revenue with a team of 4.

How much revenue does Trader Jack make?

Trader Jack generates $109K in annual revenue with a team of 2.