Latka logo

ChargeOver vs ZipDin: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

ChargeOver generates $2.7M in revenue; ZipDin generates $2.7M. ZipDin and ChargeOver are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares ChargeOver and ZipDin on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

ChargeOver vs ZipDin compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyChargeOver logoChargeOverThis companyZipDin logoZipDin
Revenue$2.7M$2.7M
Valuation$26.6M$27.1M
Team size1436
Founded20112014
HQMinneapolis, United StatesRio de Janeiro, Brazil

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

ChargeOver logo

ChargeOver at a glance

ChargeOver generates $2.7M in revenue with 14 employees, headquartered in Minneapolis, United States.

Revenue
$2.7M
Valuation
$26.6M
Team size
14
Founded
2011

Developer of a billing software designed to save time, get paid sooner, and make customers happy by automating recurring payments and subscriptions. The company's recurring billing & payments applications replaces complicated spreadsheets…

ZipDin logo

ZipDin at a glance

ZipDin generates $2.7M in revenue with 36 employees, headquartered in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Revenue
$2.7M
Valuation
$27.1M
Team size
36
Founded
2014

ZipDin is a fintech company that provides SAAS for banking, financial and private payroll loan services.

Other ChargeOver alternatives

ChargeOver competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

ChargeOver vs ZipDin: frequently asked questions

Is ChargeOver or ZipDin bigger?

ZipDin is the bigger company by revenue, at $2.7M against $2.7M for ChargeOver.

How much revenue does ChargeOver make?

ChargeOver generates $2.7M in annual revenue with a team of 14.

How much revenue does ZipDin make?

ZipDin generates $2.7M in annual revenue with a team of 36.