WorQ vs Ziptility: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
WorQ generates $1.5M in revenue; Ziptility generates $1.3M. WorQ and Ziptility are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares WorQ and Ziptility on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company |  WorQThis company |  Ziptility |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.5M | $1.3M |
| Team size | Not disclosed | 12 |
| Founded | 2019 | 2018 |
| HQ | Canberra, Australia | Bloomington, United States |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
WorQ at a glance
WorQ generates $1.5M in revenue, headquartered in Canberra, Australia.
- Revenue
- $1.5M
- Founded
- 2019
Advanced no code, AI integrated platform, with enterprise companies in Utilities, Commonwealth and sdtate government, airports, mining services
Ziptility at a glance
Ziptility generates $1.3M in revenue with 12 employees, headquartered in Bloomington, United States.
- Revenue
- $1.3M
- Team size
- 12
- Founded
- 2018
Ziptility helps busy water and wastewater teams protect, maintain, and improve their utility infrastructure with uncomplicated software that's built just for them. Learn more → https://www.ziptility.com/
Other WorQ alternatives
WorQ competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
WorQ vs Ziptility: frequently asked questions
Is WorQ or Ziptility bigger?
WorQ is the bigger company by revenue, at $1.5M against $1.3M for Ziptility.
How much revenue does WorQ make?
WorQ generates $1.5M in annual revenue.
How much revenue does Ziptility make?
Ziptility generates $1.3M in annual revenue with a team of 12.