Latka logo

ScienceSoft vs Tarvos Talent: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

ScienceSoft generates $126.7M in revenue; Tarvos Talent generates $130M. Tarvos Talent and ScienceSoft are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares ScienceSoft and Tarvos Talent on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

ScienceSoft vs Tarvos Talent compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyScienceSoft logoScienceSoftThis companyTarvos Talent logoTarvos Talent
Revenue$126.7M$130M
Team size70429
Founded19892019
HQDallas, United StatesAustin, United States

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

ScienceSoft logo

ScienceSoft at a glance

ScienceSoft generates $126.7M in revenue with 704 employees, headquartered in Dallas, United States.

Revenue
$126.7M
Team size
704
Founded
1989

Provider of custom and platform-based software development along with a broad range of IT and support services

Tarvos Talent logo

Tarvos Talent at a glance

Tarvos Talent generates $130M in revenue with 29 employees, headquartered in Austin, United States.

Revenue
$130M
Team size
29
Founded
2019

A team of highly talented and successful recruiters with over 120 years of collective experience, committed to delivering exceptional service

Other ScienceSoft alternatives

ScienceSoft competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

ScienceSoft vs Tarvos Talent: frequently asked questions

Is ScienceSoft or Tarvos Talent bigger?

Tarvos Talent is the bigger company by revenue, at $130M against $126.7M for ScienceSoft.

How much revenue does ScienceSoft make?

ScienceSoft generates $126.7M in annual revenue with a team of 704.

How much revenue does Tarvos Talent make?

Tarvos Talent generates $130M in annual revenue with a team of 29.