Cork for Homebrew vs Silk: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
Cork for Homebrew has not disclosed its revenue; Silk generates $225M. The table below compares Cork for Homebrew and Silk on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company |  Cork for HomebrewThis company |  Silk |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | Not disclosed | $225M |
| Valuation | Not disclosed | $1B |
| Funding raised | Not disclosed | $80M |
| Team size | Not disclosed | 343 |
| Founded | Not disclosed | 2019 |
| HQ | United States | Needham, United States |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
Cork for Homebrew at a glance
Cork is a lightning-fast, macOS-native graphical companion to the Homebrew package manager. It lets you install packages, add taps, maintain your Homebrew installation, and much more.
Silk at a glance
Silk generates $225M in revenue with 343 employees, headquartered in Needham, United States.
- Revenue
- $225M
- Valuation
- $1B
- Funding
- $80M
- Team size
- 343
- Founded
- 2019
Database Supercharger
Other Cork for Homebrew alternatives
Cork for Homebrew competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
Cork for Homebrew vs Silk: frequently asked questions
How much revenue does Silk make?
Silk generates $225M in annual revenue with a team of 343.
How much funding has Silk raised?
Silk has raised $80M in total funding since it was founded in 2019.