Evo Technologies vs GoodLooking: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
Last updated
Evo Technologies generates $2M in revenue; GoodLooking generates $2M. Evo Technologies and GoodLooking are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Evo Technologies and GoodLooking on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company |  Evo TechnologiesThis company |  GoodLooking |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2M | $2M |
| Team size | 18 | 18 |
| Founded | 2003 | 2009 |
| HQ | Austin, United States | Austin, United States |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
Evo Technologies at a glance
Evo Technologies generates $2M in revenue with 18 employees, headquartered in Austin, United States.
- Revenue
- $2M
- Team size
- 18
- Founded
- 2003
Console solutions for call centers, executive suites, retail, and law firms
GoodLooking at a glance
GoodLooking generates $2M in revenue with 18 employees, headquartered in Austin, United States.
- Revenue
- $2M
- Team size
- 18
- Founded
- 2009
Business management software for home services businesses
Other Evo Technologies alternatives
Evo Technologies competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
Evo Technologies vs GoodLooking: frequently asked questions
Is Evo Technologies or GoodLooking bigger?
Evo Technologies is the bigger company by revenue, at $2M against $2M for GoodLooking.
How much revenue does Evo Technologies make?
Evo Technologies generates $2M in annual revenue with a team of 18.
How much revenue does GoodLooking make?
GoodLooking generates $2M in annual revenue with a team of 18.