Latka logo

Fotomerchant vs PR ROOMS: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

Last updated

Fotomerchant generates $1.4M in revenue; PR ROOMS generates $1.5M. PR ROOMS and Fotomerchant are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Fotomerchant and PR ROOMS on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

Fotomerchant vs PR ROOMS compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyFotomerchant logoFotomerchantThis companyPR ROOMS logoPR ROOMS
Revenue$1.4M$1.5M
ValuationNot disclosed$11.6M
Team size132
Founded20072010
HQSutherland, AustraliaParis, France

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

Fotomerchant logo

Fotomerchant at a glance

Fotomerchant generates $1.4M in revenue with 13 employees, headquartered in Sutherland, Australia.

Revenue
$1.4M
Team size
13
Founded
2007

Fotomerchant is the premiere website, portfolio, commerce, and marketing platform for photographers. Fotomerchant is an online service that provides website publishing, e-commerce, financial management, and business intelligence tools for…

PR ROOMS logo

PR ROOMS at a glance

PR ROOMS generates $1.5M in revenue with 2 employees, headquartered in Paris, France.

Revenue
$1.5M
Valuation
$11.6M
Team size
2
Founded
2010

SaaS PR and content marketing solutions

Other Fotomerchant alternatives

Fotomerchant competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

Fotomerchant vs PR ROOMS: frequently asked questions

Is Fotomerchant or PR ROOMS bigger?

PR ROOMS is the bigger company by revenue, at $1.5M against $1.4M for Fotomerchant.

How much revenue does Fotomerchant make?

Fotomerchant generates $1.4M in annual revenue with a team of 13.

How much revenue does PR ROOMS make?

PR ROOMS generates $1.5M in annual revenue with a team of 2.