- Revenue
- $25M
- Customers
- 1.7K
- Year founded
- 2011
- Funding
- $30M
- Team size
- 210
Top 2 Shared Inbox Software Companies With $10M–$100M Revenue (August 2026)
As of August 2026, Latka tracks 2 shared inbox software companies with $10M–$100M in annual revenue. They have combined revenues of $42.8M and employ 319 people. They have raised $68.1M and serve 9.7K customers combined.
Every company below sells shared inbox software to other businesses and is ranked by its most recent annual revenue. Revenue, funding, headcount and customer figures come from CEO interviews on the Latka podcast, public company filings, and Latka estimates where a company has not disclosed a number.
What Shared Inbox Software Companies do
Shared Inbox Software is designed to streamline communication for teams by consolidating multiple email accounts into a single, accessible inbox. This setup allows teams to collaboratively manage emails from common addresses such as support@ or info@, facilitating efficient communication without the chaos of individual inboxes. The primary use cases include customer support, sales inquiries, and project collaboration, where timely responses and teamwork are crucial. Typical features of shared inbox software include shared access to email threads, the ability to assign messages to team members, and discussion threads to provide context for email conversations. These tools often integrate with other communication platforms, allowing teams to manage various types of interactions, including email, chat, and social media, from a single interface. Common buyers include customer support managers, team leaders in sales, and IT departments looking for improved internal communication workflows.
- Companies
- 2
- Revenue
- $42.8M
- Funding
- $68.1M
- Employees
- 319
Filters
Sorting: Highest -> Lowest
Top Shared Inbox Software Companies With $10M–$100M Revenue
Showing 2 of 2 companies ranked by annual revenue.
2
Trengo
Utrecht, Netherlands
Developer of an online social application designed for improving communication channel in an enterprise. The company's application streamlines emails, social media and whatsapp messages, calls and collaborate in team inbox, providing enterprises an innovative solution to communicate with their clients via all communication and media channels through one shared inbox.
- Revenue
- $17.9M
- Customers
- 8K
- Year founded
- 2015
- Funding
- $38.1M
- Team size
- 109
Frequently asked questions about Shared Inbox Software Companies With $10M–$100M Revenue
How many shared inbox software companies with $10M–$100M in annual revenue are there?
Latka tracks 2 shared inbox software companies with $10M–$100M in annual revenue. Together they generate $42.8M in annual revenue and employ 319 people.
Which shared inbox software company with $10M–$100M in annual revenue is the largest?
HiverhqHiver is the largest, with $25M in annual revenue, founded in 2011.
How much revenue does a typical shared inbox software company with $10M–$100M in annual revenue make?
The average shared inbox software company in this list makes $21.4M a year, across 2 companies with reported revenue. They serve 9.7K customers combined.
Who are the leading Shared Inbox software vendors with $10M–$100M in annual revenue?
Ranked by annual revenue, the leaders are HiverhqHiver and Trengo.
How much funding have shared inbox software companies with $10M–$100M in annual revenue raised?
The 2 shared inbox software companies with $10M–$100M in annual revenue tracked here have raised $68.1M in disclosed funding between them.
Related Collaboration & Productivity Software categories
Inclusion Criteria
- The software must allow multiple users to access and manage a single email inbox. - It must include features for assigning emails to specific team members for accountability. - The software should support threaded discussions within email responses for clarity. - It must provide reporting or metrics to track response times and team performance. - Not just for email; it should also integrate with other communication channels (e.g., chat, social media). - The solution must foster collaboration without creating confusion or message overlap.