Latka logo

Stride Labs vs Zeendo: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

Stride Labs generates $148.5K in revenue; Zeendo generates $629.3K. Zeendo is 4.2× bigger than Stride Labs by revenue. The table below compares Stride Labs and Zeendo on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

Stride Labs vs Zeendo compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyStride Labs logoStride LabsThis companyZeendo logoZeendo
Revenue$148.5K$629.3K
ValuationNot disclosed$6.3M
Team size43
Founded20142013
HQSan Francisco, United StatesSpain

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

Stride Labs logo

Stride Labs at a glance

Stride Labs generates $148.5K in revenue with 4 employees, headquartered in San Francisco, United States.

Revenue
$148.5K
Team size
4
Founded
2014

Purchase stridelabs.com today. Starter logo included. Money back guarantee. Fast domain transfer.

Zeendo logo

Zeendo at a glance

Zeendo generates $629.3K in revenue with 3 employees, headquartered in Spain.

Revenue
$629.3K
Valuation
$6.3M
Team size
3
Founded
2013

Zeendo is the perfect website editor to empower hosting, telco and internet companies' Cloud Go-to-Market. We provide the tools for SOHO & SMEs to have complete web presence: web, hosting, domain, e-mail, e-commerce, SEO optimization, DIY…

Other Stride Labs alternatives

Stride Labs competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

Stride Labs vs Zeendo: frequently asked questions

Is Stride Labs or Zeendo bigger?

Zeendo is the bigger company by revenue, at $629.3K against $148.5K for Stride Labs.

How much revenue does Stride Labs make?

Stride Labs generates $148.5K in annual revenue with a team of 4.

How much revenue does Zeendo make?

Zeendo generates $629.3K in annual revenue with a team of 3.