Verde Circle vs WorkStyle: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
Verde Circle generates $238K in revenue; WorkStyle generates $245.2K. WorkStyle and Verde Circle are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Verde Circle and WorkStyle on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company |  Verde CircleThis company |  WorkStyle |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $238K | $245.2K |
| Valuation | $2.4M | $1.7M |
| Team size | 1 | 3 |
| Founded | 2014 | 2018 |
| HQ | United States | London, United Kingdom |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
Verde Circle at a glance
Verde Circle generates $238K in revenue with 1 employees, headquartered in United States.
- Revenue
- $238K
- Valuation
- $2.4M
- Team size
- 1
- Founded
- 2014
Verde Circle is a software company developing cloud-based systems that make small businesses more efficient through intuitive interfaces, quantifiable business intelligence, and transformative process flow. We are developing a suite of…
WorkStyle at a glance
WorkStyle generates $245.2K in revenue with 3 employees, headquartered in London, United Kingdom.
- Revenue
- $245.2K
- Valuation
- $1.7M
- Team size
- 3
- Founded
- 2018
WorkStyle is a software tool that helps build effective teams using the science of organisational psychology.
Other Verde Circle alternatives
Verde Circle competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
Verde Circle vs WorkStyle: frequently asked questions
Is Verde Circle or WorkStyle bigger?
WorkStyle is the bigger company by revenue, at $245.2K against $238K for Verde Circle.
How much revenue does Verde Circle make?
Verde Circle generates $238K in annual revenue with a team of 1.
How much revenue does WorkStyle make?
WorkStyle generates $245.2K in annual revenue with a team of 3.