Latka logo

Full Scale vs WorkWhile: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

Full Scale generates $7.5M in revenue; WorkWhile generates $8.4M. WorkWhile and Full Scale are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Full Scale and WorkWhile on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

Full Scale vs WorkWhile compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyFull Scale logoFull ScaleThis companyWorkWhile logoWorkWhile
Revenue$7.5M$8.4M
ValuationNot disclosed$126.5M
Team size32265
Founded2018Not disclosed
HQKansas City, United StatesSan Francisco, United States

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

Full Scale logo

Full Scale at a glance

Full Scale generates $7.5M in revenue with 322 employees, headquartered in Kansas City, United States.

Revenue
$7.5M
Team size
322
Founded
2018

Staffing company recruiting, assessing, retaining and employing expert software developers who integrate with the client's team

WorkWhile logo

WorkWhile at a glance

WorkWhile generates $8.4M in revenue with 65 employees, headquartered in San Francisco, United States.

Revenue
$8.4M
Valuation
$126.5M
Team size
65

The labor platform connects the top hourly workers with shifts that align with their expertise, availability, and proximity.

Other Full Scale alternatives

Full Scale competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

Full Scale vs WorkWhile: frequently asked questions

Is Full Scale or WorkWhile bigger?

WorkWhile is the bigger company by revenue, at $8.4M against $7.5M for Full Scale.

How much revenue does Full Scale make?

Full Scale generates $7.5M in annual revenue with a team of 322.

How much revenue does WorkWhile make?

WorkWhile generates $8.4M in annual revenue with a team of 65.