
42Q is a former Cloud Management Platforms company based in San Jose, founded in 2016.
42Q revenue
42Q has not published its revenue. GetLatka estimates it at about $5M a year (December 2023).
All 2 revenue readings, with sources
| As of | Revenue | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 2021 | $2.7M | – |
| Dec 2023 | $5MEST. | GetLatka estimate |
– source not recorded
42Q competitors
42Q competes most directly with HackerRank, CodeSignal and LeetCode.
| Company | Revenue | Funding | Employees | Founded |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $221M | $102.9M | 13 | 2009 | |
| $53.8M | $87.5M | 116 | 2014 | |
| $8M | $11.7M | 264 | 2015 | |
| $5M | – | 56 | 2016 |
42Q CEO, founders & employees
Bob Eulau founded 42Q in 2016 and led it as CEO. 42Q had 56 employees (December 2023, LinkedIn), up from 47 a year earlier.
- Bob EulauFounder & CEO
All 4 headcount readings, with sources
| As of | Employees | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 2023 | 56 | |
| Dec 2022 | 47 | |
| Dec 2021 | 36 | |
| Apr 2021 | 36 | – |
42Q FAQ
Is 42Q still in business?
No. 42Q has shut down.
What was 42Q's revenue?
GetLatka estimates 42Q's revenue at about $5M a year (December 2023). The company hasn't published its own figure.
How many employees does 42Q have?
42Q had 56 employees in December 2023, according to LinkedIn.
Who founded 42Q?
Bob Eulau founded 42Q in 2016.
Browse Cloud Management Platforms
Categories
- All Cloud Management Platforms companies, ranked
- Manufacturing Execution System (MES) Software
- Supply Chain Management Software
- SaaS Operations Management Software
- ERP Systems
- Supply Chain Planning Software
- Inventory Management Software
- Industrial IoT Software
- Process Automation Software
- Best IT Management Software
- Best ERP Software
- Best Supply Chain & Logistics Software
- All industries
How this page is sourced
3 from public sources · 1 estimate. Founder figures link to the second they were said; public figures name their source; estimates are marked EST. and say whose they are. Not financial advice.
Updated Dec 23, 2023Data disclaimerReport a correction