2024 Revenue
$92M(Est.)
Customers
1K
Funding
$82.3M
Avg ACV
$92K
Team
694
Founded
2011
Celigo Revenue & Funding (2024)
Celigo is an integration platform as a service (iPaaS) company founded in 2011 and headquartered in the United States. The company connects enterprise applications, manages APIs, enables EDI-based supply chain connectivity, and is expanding into data ingestion for warehouses such as Snowflake and Redshift. Jan Arendtsz, the CEO and co-founder, built the business alongside CTO and co-founder Scott Henderson, bootstrapping from a consulting firm through 2015 before raising outside capital.
As of September 2024, Celigo reported approximately $92 million in annual recurring revenue against $72 million in total primary capital raised, a ratio of roughly 1.6 dollars raised per dollar of ARR. The company has set a target of reaching $100 million ARR by the end of 2024. Celigo competes directly with MuleSoft, Workato, and Zapier in the iPaaS and enterprise automation space.
Celigo has pursued a deliberately conservative valuation strategy across its funding history, accepting lower multiples in exchange for cleaner deal terms and what Arendtsz described as better long-term board partnerships. The Series C round in 2021, which the host cited at $48.5 million on a $540 million post-money valuation, was structured to eliminate preferences and align preferred shares economically with common shares, keeping employee stock options above water.
Last updated
Celigo Revenue
Celigo reported approximately $92 million in ARR as of September 2024, with a stated goal of reaching $100 million ARR by the end of 2024. Arendtsz told the interviewer: 'We've raised a total of 72,000,000 in primary capital to get to roughly about 92,000,000 in ARR right now. So that's the ratio that I look. That's about 1.6. Right? For every dollar of ARR, how much have you invested in terms of raised capital?'
| Year | Milestone | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Celigo Hit $92m revenue in September 2024 | Watch[1]Estimated |
| 2023 | Celigo Hit $85m revenue in December 2023 | |
| 2022 | Celigo Hit $67m revenue in December 2022 | |
| 2021 | Celigo Hit $48m revenue in December 2021 | |
| 2020 | Celigo Hit $33m revenue in December 2020 | |
| 2019 | Celigo Hit $22m revenue in December 2019 | |
| 2018 | Celigo Hit $16m revenue in December 2018 | |
| 2017 | Celigo Hit $10m revenue in December 2017 | |
| 2016 | Celigo Hit $7m revenue in December 2016 | |
| 2015 | Celigo Hit $4m revenue in January 2015 | Watch[2]Estimated |
| 2011 | Launched with $0 revenue |
The company's revenue history traces a multi-year build. Celigo was bootstrapped from 2011 through the end of 2015, reaching approximately $4 million in ARR at that point. The current product launched in March 2016 following a deliberate rebuild. Revenue grew from roughly $10 million around the time of the Series B to approximately $16 million around the time of the Series C in 2018, before accelerating to the current $92 million figure. The host noted it took four to five years to reach the first $5 million in revenue, consistent with the bootstrapped 2011 to 2015 period.
A GetLatka forward estimate, applying a deceleration-adjusted growth rate from the $16 million to $92 million trajectory over roughly six years, suggests 2025 ARR in a range of approximately $100 million to $115 million. This is a GetLatka estimate based on the trailing growth arc and the company's own $100 million year-end 2024 target; Arendtsz did not provide a 2025 figure.
Celigo Valuation, Funding Rounds
Celigo has not publicly disclosed its valuation. The company has raised $82.3M in total funding to date.
Celigo has raised $82.3M in total funding across 5 rounds, most recently a $48.5M Series C round in 2021.
| Year | Round | Amount | Valuation | % Sold | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Series C | $48.5M | - | - | |
| 2019 | Funding round | $20M | - | - | |
| 2017 | Series A | $4M | - | - | |
| 2015 | Series A | $8.3M | - | - | |
| 2015 | Venture Debt | $1.5M | - | - | Estimated |
Interview Notes
Company snapshot
- Celigo turned a consulting-funded reboot into a fast-scaling automation suite.
- “Real” product launch: March 2016 (post-pivot).
- Current ARR (May 2024): ≈ $92 million; FY-end 2024 goal: $100 million.
- Total funding: $72 million equity + $1.5 million early debt (repaid).
- Capital efficiency: ≈ $1 of ARR for every $0.78 of equity (1.3×).
- Bootstrapped phase: 2011-15, funded by consulting revenue.
Growth trajectory
- Revenue expanded methodically as the platform widened.
- 2015: ≈ $4 M ARR on a legacy product, pre-pivot.
- 2017: ≈ $10 M as the new platform gained traction.
- 2018: ≈ $16 M after broadening use-cases.
- 2024: ≈ $92 M with a horizontal automation suite—aiming for $100 M by December.
Funding rounds & discipline
- Celigo optimized for fit over vanity multiples.
- Series A (Dec 2015): ≈ $15 M, ~4.8× ARR multiple, raised pre-product at ≈ $30 M post-money.
- Series A extension (2017): $4 M bridge at the same valuation while shipping features.
- Series B (2020): amount undisclosed, ~6.3× ARR multiple—chosen for partner/board fit over richer bids.
- Series C (2021): $48 M primary; single-dip 1× pref, minimal ($7.9 M) secondary and debt cleanup.
- Cumulative primary equity: $72 M—valuations kept “above water” for employee options.
Product expansion
- The platform now spans far beyond classic iPaaS connectors.
- Core iPaaS: app-to-app and process automation.
- API Management: build & govern first-party APIs with security/compliance baked in.
- EDI Gateway: modern interface for supply-chain document flows.
- Data-warehouse ingest (launching): one-click ELT from SaaS apps into Snowflake, Redshift, etc.
- Positioning: “automation platform of the enterprise.”
Culture & cap-table philosophy
- Governance choices keep incentives tight and long-term.
- Preferred ≈ common: Series C simplified prefs to a flat 1× liquidation, aligning all stakeholders.
- Minimal secondary: early team remains “all-in”; option pool solidly in-the-money.
- Board-fit first: founder Jan vetted 25+ firms to find partners with a 5-10-year build-for-value horizon.
Quick-grab numbers
- 2011-15 consulting → product pivot.
- $4 M → $92 M ARR in 9 years.
- $72 M equity / $1.5 M debt total funding.
- ≈ 1.3× ARR per $ raised.
- Targeting $100 M ARR by Q4-2024.
- Adjacent products live / shipping: API, EDI, ELT pipelines.
Founder / CEO
Jan Arendtsz
CEO
Jan Arendtsz is the CEO and co-founder of Celigo. He described himself as a first-time founder. Scott Henderson is the CTO and co-founder. Together they bootstrapped the company from 2011, converting it from a consulting business into a software company. In 2015, Arendtsz and Henderson made the decision to rebuild the product entirely while continuing to operate the existing business, funding the rebuild without outside equity until the Series A closed at the end of 2015.
Arendtsz has been the primary spokesperson on capital strategy, consistently choosing lower valuation multiples in exchange for cleaner terms and what he described as better board partnerships. He noted that employee stock options remain above water as a result of this approach. Net worth was not discussed in the interview; any estimate would require confirmed ownership percentage data that was not provided.
Q&A
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
| What's your age? | - |
| Favorite online tool? | - |
| Favorite book? | - |
| Favorite CEO? | - |
| Advice for 20 year old self | - |
Customers
Customer count, pricing per seat, and ARPU were not discussed in the interview. Celigo serves enterprises across multiple verticals and company sizes, and Arendtsz described the platform as a true horizontal solution capable of connecting any application with an API, flat files, or database regardless of vertical or company size. Specific customer figures were not disclosed.
Celigo serves 1K customers.
Celigo Business Model
Celigo operates as an iPaaS and enterprise automation platform, generating revenue through software subscriptions. The company connects enterprise applications, provides API management and governance, enables EDI-based supply chain connectivity, and is developing a data ingestion product for warehouses including Snowflake and Redshift.
Arendtsz cited a capital efficiency ratio of approximately 1.6 dollars raised per dollar of ARR, using $72 million raised against $92 million in ARR as the basis. Profitability, gross margin, churn, retention, CAC, LTV, and burn rate were not discussed in the interview. The company used a significant portion of its Series C proceeds to fund research and development, expanding from a core iPaaS into API management, EDI, and data pipeline capabilities.
Celigo Employees & Team Size
Headcount figures were not discussed in the interview. The company's known people roster reflects a large and diverse team spanning software engineering, product management, sales, customer success, finance, and operations across multiple geographies including the United States and India, but no specific employee count was stated by Arendtsz.
Celigo employs approximately 694 people as of 2026, down from 744 in 2023, including 84 sales reps that carry a quota. It serves 1K customers that rely on its solutions.
| Year | Milestone | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Reached 694 employees (October 2024) | |
| 2023 | Reached 744 employees (November 2023) | |
| 2023 | Reached 744 employees (September 2023) | |
| 2023 | Reached 676 employees (July 2023) | |
| 2023 | Reached 683 employees (January 2023) | |
| 2022 | Reached 636 employees (November 2022) | |
| 2022 | Reached 636 employees (January 2022) | |
| 2021 | Reached 423 employees (November 2021) | |
| 2021 | Reached 423 employees (August 2021) | |
| 2021 | Reached 353 employees (April 2021) |
Frequently Asked Questions about Celigo
What is Celigo's revenue?
Celigo generates an estimated $92M in annual revenue.
Who founded Celigo?
Celigo was founded by Jan Arendtsz.
Who is the CEO of Celigo?
The CEO of Celigo is Jan Arendtsz.
How much funding does Celigo have?
Celigo raised $82.3M across 5 rounds.
How many employees does Celigo have?
Celigo has 694 employees.
Where is Celigo headquarters?
Celigo is headquartered in Redwood City, California, United States.
Compare Celigo to the industry
Celigo operates across multiple industries. Browse revenue, funding, and growth data for Celigo in each sector below.
Full Interview Transcripts
While Zapier Gets all the Press, Celigo Just Doubled Revenue to $95m, CEO Jan ArendtszSep 5, 2024
[00:00] Then like there's this dark horse out there, and I love dark horses. When I find one, I wanna get them on stage. Right? And so there's this other company that maybe you've heard of, called Soligo, and it's run by a gentleman, named Jan Arens. And what he's done is he's built a company that's well over a $100,000,000 of revenue, but hasn't had to go out and raise $400,000,000 of revenue and directly competes with the likes of [00:21] MuleSoft. We're gonna dive into it all today. Please give mister Jan a warm round of applause. Welcome to the stage. Stage. [00:33] We didn't we didn't go through that intro together, but I'm I'm pretty it's pretty close. Right? [00:38] >> You you got something wrong, but we'll talk Okay. About [00:40] But do you know Work Auto's revenue? [00:44] >> $1.70. But I'm I'm not here to talk about that. [00:46] Okay. [00:47] >> But we're not quite at a 100,000,000 yet. [00:49] Okay. [00:49] >> You're That's that's a [00:50] >> small question. [00:51] It's it's a fair statement to say, though, you are way more capital efficient than [00:54] >> Oh, for sure. Right? So I think we've raised a total of 72,000,000 in primary capital Mhmm. To get to roughly about 92,000,000 Yep. In ARR right now. So that's the ratio that I look. That's about 1.6. Right? For every dollar of ARR, how much have you invested in terms of raised capital? [01:16] When I study your story and not just what you say on interviews, but what you've actually done in form d filings and multiples and how you've done it, you have way, way more discipline around valuation than everyone else I've seen in the space, even Wade. I mean, everyone else I've interviewed in the space. So I'm really excited to dive into that. So here's the visual in terms of revenue growth. You guys all have it. Again, four [01:38] or five years to get to that first $5,000,000 of revenue. Right? Early slog. [01:43] >> Yeah. And that's an interesting story in of itself because we were bootstrapped from 2011 to end of two thousand fifteen. By the way, we converted from a consulting company prior to that. [01:56] Oh, I didn't know that. [01:57] >> Okay. So hence why we were able to fund the company. And we got to 2,015, early two thousand fifteen. At that time, I think we were about 4,000,000 in ARR, and my CTO and I had a conversation. And we knew the product that we had didn't really meet muster because everything was changing. We we connect these various apps together. The way companies acquired SaaS apps, the way they wanted to connect them together, all of that was [02:28] >> changing rapidly. And the product that we had was archaic. It was not the right user experience. So unfunded, we decided we're gonna go build a new product. So in 2015, took a few engineers while still continuing business to go build a new product. Hence, why we only show the revenue starting in in 2016. And and that coincided with raising our series a round last day of 2015, and we entered 2016. Still without a product, we came [03:02] >> out with it, I think, in March. Mhmm. But but that's for our practical purposes, the company was really founded in 2015. [03:08] And that is what that shot looks like in 2016, right, at series a time. So you can see the product drop down to the top, smart connectors, productivity apps, integrators. For those of you trying to get your bearings in terms of what world we're [03:18] >> going on [03:19] right now, think of where this is the iPass space. Right? Integration platform as a service. One of the leading players in the iPass space. We named some of the other people in the space earlier, but very hot space. It's effectively it's effectively the tunneling of the Internet, basically. [03:32] >> So yeah. We sometimes I use the term, it's the plumbing. Right? In any given company, you've got all these applications. You've got data sources. You've got a data warehouse with the plumbing that connects these together, ingest data into a data warehouse. Yes. API management, connecting with your trading partners, we do all of that. It's an automation platform. [03:52] So what I want you guys to focus on here is that that that last number in the headline on this screenshot because that multiple is one that is way lower than what others were raising in the space at the same time. And again, you have a discipline around here. I want you to elaborate on a second on that, but I wanna establish the pattern more here first. So this was it was about 8.3 on about a [04:11] 30 post. Right? Right around that? [04:13] >> That's correct. Yep. That's correct. Yeah. [04:16] So pushing that forward in 2016, you then did, an extension or something, right, in 2017? [04:20] >> What was this? Yeah. In 2017, we just did an extension of the series a round, another 4,000,000. [04:26] Correct. Also disciplined, held before x. Again, I wanna I'm gonna ask Deepa about that here in a second. But pushing forward, we're now in twenty seventeen, twenty eighteen. I assume this new growth from 10,000,000 to 16,000,000 is the new product starting to get some traction. [04:38] >> Correct. And and look, the when we came out with the product in 2016, it was pretty nascent. It was missing a fabulous functionality for us to go compete with some of the other bigger players. We didn't have the biggest r and d team. We we we're still kind of in silent stealth mode building the the various features we needed because, look, in the end, doing integration, connecting these apps, automating business processes, it's just a lot of [05:07] >> work. Right? There's there's so much functionality for us to go build. So we we took small steps. We found little segments of the market that we could monetize at that time while we continue to build the platform. [05:21] So the next slide talks about this idea that anyone can I mean, look, can go raise a billion dollars, and if you know, the fastest way to make a $100,000,000 is to raise a billion and then, you know, burn 900,000,000 on fire? Right? And you're left with a 100,000,000. And there are people that are really good at that. So I know you don't wanna talk about these, and I built this deck, but we're gonna talk about [05:37] it anyway because I wanna give you credit. I think maybe the most capital efficient and sort of the enterprise, you know, plumbing for the Internet space, and you see the data to back it up here on the screen. When you look at a deal that Salesforce did to buy MuleSoft at the time, one of the highest multiples paid 21 x multiple. And so when I'm studying this data, you know, pulling from my records from pockets interviews [05:59] and getlacka.com preparing for this, I'm going, this is so wild because Jan's raising at a four x and no joke, like a couple years later and then you actually did a round right after this, we'll talk about in a second. The 21 x multiple at MuleSoft, but you did it at four x. Question is why? You had a good growth story. You know, Workato seems to just be, you know, like light just raising as much as [06:17] they can. You see these headlines of a 5,700,000,000 valuation, but they only have got, you know, $150,170,000,000 bucks of ARR. So the multiple there also just feels like how they go into that valuation. Obviously, Zapier bootstrap different story. Do you have a backstory where you're founder in the past that got burned on too high evaluation? Why do have so much discipline here? [06:37] >> Short answer is no. I'm a first time founder. And, like, you you look at what's in front of you. Right? Where you are, where you're trying to head, why you're raising money, how much you wanna raise at that particular time, and what is the right multiple at that time. I think the by the way, it was not a four x. It was almost a five x in our series a round. K. At that time, we were [07:09] >> unproven because we were building a new product, didn't have it in market yet, and it was a risk for our series a investor to come in and invest in a company that still didn't have the the future product of the company. So so that's why in the end, we we ended up at at that multiple. Mhmm. But in our series b round, series c round, right, there were other extenuating factors. I think every round was different. [07:38] In this round, what was the extenuating factor? I imagine you had term sheets on the table for much higher than a 6.3 x multiple. You took this deal for a particular reason related to terms. [07:47] >> Yeah. So this one's pretty simple. Look. I we had multiple term sheets. I'd been speaking to maybe 25, 30 investors at the time. Like, we got term sheets from about five to 10. It really came down to the firm and the person who was gonna sit on the board. Board dynamics are super important for me. And we went with the investor that we thought you know, looking beyond the multiple, like, who's gonna partner with you over [08:17] >> the next five, seven, ten years to build a sustainable business? Do they have the same philosophy in terms of where you can take this business? Are they looking for a quick exit? So on and so forth. Right? So when you take all of that and and the multiples count as well, you I think the series b really came down to who we thought was the best firm to take us forward. [08:41] Mhmm. I mean, I don't know if you guys see these and think the same as I think, but you see the subtext in this header. Right? This these aren't like different years. This is the exact you were doing this thinking and saying a good partner and a good board seat is way more valuable, and we can actually quantify that because MuleSoft had just exited for twenty one x. Right? So, like, you had that in your quiver [09:01] to use in your negotiations if you wanted to anchor that. You didn't. You chose to take a much lower valuation. It really was just a better person on the board and a better partnership. There were no economic secondary [09:13] >> Well, it's building a company. We we always believe that this is a big space, massive TAM, and this company as a standalone entity could be worth a lot someday. And and so you really try to find the right partner to be able to take you there. I mean, it's it's really that simple. [09:32] Yep. Valuation goes up, obviously, a little bit. You keep growing. Series c forty eight five forty in 2021. Product has expanded at this point. Right? You can see that first com, a lot of business processes you call out, a couple of different verticals at this point, software and SaaS. You wanna elaborate on those quickly? [09:46] >> Yeah. So so at this point, in 2021, we went from being more of a niche player maybe five years back, gradually building out the platform where we could say we are a true horizontal platform. You have any set of apps in the enterprise that has an API, flat files, database, what have you. We can go and connect any of that irrespective of the vertical, irrespective of the apps that you have, irrespective of company size, and it [10:19] >> took us a while to be able to build out the the product to get there. So so that was a big transformation from our series b round to our series c round, I would say, in terms of the product and the scope of what we could do. [10:32] And at this point, 2021, mean, you're ten years into the business. I imagine you had some early employees that maybe had some options that were around maybe some early angels. Had you created any sort of secondary liquidity options up to this point that made you in this round? [10:43] >> Very little. And even though we had the opportunity for some key employees to really maybe get some secondary, Everyone was pretty excited in terms of what we were doing, and we didn't really end up doing that. [10:57] So there there wasn't secondary as part of this? [10:59] >> There was there was a little bit of secondary, but I think in the grand scheme of things, I would say fairly minute. Mhmm. [11:08] The form d filing shows about 7,900,000 was allocated as sort of use of proceeds for, like, internal purposes. Did that whole chunk end up going towards early employees, secondary? [11:19] >> A combination. There were some other early [11:22] >> debt providers and and so on and so forth. [11:25] So Okay. Tell me more about that. You had to pay off debt providers? [11:28] >> It was a very small I think we raised about a million and 0.5 in debt, I think. [11:36] In what year? [11:37] >> 2015, maybe. [11:39] Oh, wow. So that I was wrong. Your first outside capital was not that equity raise. It was debt. [11:44] >> Yeah. And yeah. So so there was a warrant there. Okay. Okay. But that was that was it. Yeah. [11:51] Yeah. Okay. So the business keeps growing. You're doing these great deals. You're creating some liquidity for the debt providers, maybe some other folks. Revenue continues to grow. This is where you're at today in 2024. What do guys think you'll finish at end of this year? [12:02] >> So the goal is to be roughly around a 100,000,000 by the end of [12:07] And this is how you're positioning yourself today? [12:09] >> Correct. A lot has changed. Right? So we've we've really gone beyond being a core iPass. I think most people think of an iPass as connecting various apps in the enterprise together, but we are a lot more than that. We moved into adjacent spaces. We have full API management capabilities. If you wanna build APIs and govern them with, all the security and compliance, we do that. If you wanna connect with your trading partners using some marquee technology [12:38] >> called EDI, in case some of you are familiar with that, we we've built, an awesome, new product on top of our platform to allow the companies to be able to connect with their supply chain, with big box retailers, and be able to do, business. And then we're, fairly soon coming out with a new product for ingesting data into a data warehouse. So just imagine any of your operational SaaS systems you wanna be able to easily ingest [13:06] >> it into your data warehouse of choice, such as a Snowflake, Redshift, so on and so forth. We can you can do that in a few clicks. So these are some of the innovations that we've really invested post series c round. We used a fair bit of the money to funnel that into r and d so that we can really take it to the next level and go from being just a pure iPass to the automation platform [13:31] >> of the enterprise. [13:32] And I love that. Started off as a consulting company, really got going in 2011. Little pivot, you know, 2014, 2015, new product starts to take off. Remains conservative in valuations, which I love because it means he has full optionality today. He could take a $400,000,000, $500,000,000 offer, and everyone makes money because he hasn't, you know, driven the knife through roof. He's not gonna do that because he's very excited about what he's building. [13:53] >> Yeah. Just one thing on that series c round. We had the option of raising at a much higher multiple with some structure. [14:01] How high? [14:02] >> Like Without getting any numbers right, we decided to take out all preferences and structure out in that series c round. [14:10] No liquidity? [14:11] >> So there's a there's a one x preference. But in in the end, ultimately, it boils down to a common share. It's pretty much the same as a as a preferred share. And that was one of the smartest things that we did without being greedy and and try to get into, look, Ma, we raised that this multiple. It it sounds great. Right? But then we knew things were gonna come down. And [14:40] >> I'm proud to say, right, that if you look at our employees'stock options, it's not underwater. It means [14:47] >> something above water. Yeah. [14:48] Yeah. Guys, when I find stories like this through little clues, I wanna celebrate them. I wanna get them on stage. I can't get everything out of them in ten minutes, so please find them. I mean and the fact that you're able to seriously see at that level and have them basically be treated the same way as common shares is incredible and a huge testament to what you're doing for your employees, just managing [15:06] the company for long term sustainability. So, guys, give it up for Jan from Solego. [15:10] >> Thank you. [15:11] You enjoy that? You have fun? Yes. Yes. Alright. Thank you so much. Appreciate it.
Read More About Celigo
Data and Sources
All figures on this page are taken directly from interviews or are estimates from public sources and proprietary models. Not financial advice. Read full disclaimer.
Claim this profilePeople Also Viewed
insitro
insitro is a data-driven drug discovery and development company that leverages machine learning and...
Pontera
Pontera is a fintech company on a mission to help millions of Americans retire better by enabling...
Studypool
Provider of an online education platform designed to help students solve academic questions. The...
gobridgit.com
Bridgit is a leading provider of construction resource management software, helping construction...
HelloBetter
HelloBetter is a global pioneer in the field of digital therapeutics (DTx) and prescription digital...
Hola
Provider of a community-powered virtual private network designed to offer a secure internet. The...