Latka logo

Tomo QuickCal (Beta) vs Intercom: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

Tomo QuickCal (Beta) has not disclosed its revenue; Intercom generates $400M. The table below compares Tomo QuickCal (Beta) and Intercom on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

Tomo QuickCal (Beta) vs Intercom compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyTomo QuickCal (Beta) logoTomo QuickCal (Beta)This companyIntercom logoIntercom
RevenueNot disclosed$400M
ValuationNot disclosed$1.3B
Funding raisedNot disclosed$241.9M
CustomersNot disclosed30K
Team sizeNot disclosed1.5K
Founded20162011
HQLondon, United KingdomSan Francisco, United States

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

Tomo QuickCal (Beta) logo

Tomo QuickCal (Beta) at a glance

Founded
2016

It's a friendly Executive Assistant that lives in chat: - Reads your calendar and availability - Sends the invite instantly - Even suggests a good spot if you’re meeting in person

Intercom logo

Intercom at a glance

Intercom generates $400M in revenue with 1.5K employees, headquartered in San Francisco, United States.

Revenue
$400M
Valuation
$1.3B
Funding
$241.9M
Customers
30K
Team size
1.5K
Founded
2011

A platform to provide a seamless customer experience across AI and human support, delivering increased customer satisfaction while reducing costs.

Other Tomo QuickCal (Beta) alternatives

Tomo QuickCal (Beta) competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

Tomo QuickCal (Beta) vs Intercom: frequently asked questions

How much revenue does Intercom make?

Intercom generates $400M in annual revenue with a team of 1.5K.

How much funding has Intercom raised?

Intercom has raised $241.9M in total funding since it was founded in 2011.