1
Forensic Notes
Langley, British Columbia, Canada
Secure & Court-Ready Electronic Notes - A Documentation Solution Built for Law Enforcement and Civil Investigators (SaaS application)
- Revenue
- $638.7K
- Year founded
- 2015
- Funding
- $37.2K
- Team size
- 3
Top 2 Court Management Software Companies Under $1M Revenue (September 2026)
As of September 2026, Latka tracks 2 court management software companies under $1M in annual revenue. They have combined revenues of $1.2M and employ 15 people. They have raised $37.2K and serve 150 customers combined.
Every company below sells court management software to other businesses and is ranked by its most recent annual revenue. Revenue, funding, headcount and customer figures come from CEO interviews on the Latka podcast, public company filings, and Latka estimates where a company has not disclosed a number.
What Court Management Software Companies do
Court Management Software is designed to streamline and automate the various processes involved in the judicial system. It supports activities from case initiation to resolution, enabling court clerks, judges, and attorneys to manage case-related documentation, schedules, and communications effectively. These systems may include features such as electronic filing, calendaring, document management, and performance analytics to facilitate efficient court operations. Primarily used by courts and judicial administration, this software aims to improve case processing efficiency and ensure accurate record-keeping. Typical workflows involve tracking case progress, managing dockets, and handling fines or fees, which promotes timely resolution of cases. Common buyer personas usually include court management personnel, legal administrators, and IT staff focused on integrating solution capabilities with existing systems.
- Companies
- 2
- Revenue
- $1.2M
- Funding
- $37.2K
- Employees
- 15
Filters
Sorting: Highest -> Lowest
Top Court Management Software Companies Under $1M Revenue
Showing 2 of 2 companies ranked by annual revenue.
2
Matterhorn
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Developer of a cloud based online arbitrator platform designed to help courts handle many high-volume infractions, disputes and outstanding warrants online. The company's cloud based online arbitrator platform offers online negotiation systems and online resolution options for litigants charged with relatively minor offenses and help litigants with outstanding issues to understand their options and navigate the court online without needing to hire an attorney, enabling citizens and courts to solve minor cases.
- Revenue
- $611K
- Customers
- 150
- Year founded
- 2014
- Team size
- 12
Frequently asked questions about Court Management Software Companies Under $1M Revenue
How many court management software companies under $1M in annual revenue are there?
Latka tracks 2 court management software companies under $1M in annual revenue. Together they generate $1.2M in annual revenue and employ 15 people.
Which court management software company under $1M in annual revenue is the largest?
Forensic Notes is the largest, with $638.7K in annual revenue, founded in 2015.
How much revenue does a typical court management software company under $1M in annual revenue make?
The average court management software company in this list makes $624.8K a year, across 2 companies with reported revenue. They serve 150 customers combined.
Who are the leading Court Management software vendors under $1M in annual revenue?
Ranked by annual revenue, the leaders are Forensic Notes and Matterhorn.
How much funding have court management software companies under $1M in annual revenue raised?
The 2 court management software companies under $1M in annual revenue tracked here have raised $37.2K in disclosed funding between them.
Related Vertical Industry Software categories
Inclusion Criteria
- Must facilitate case management from initiation to disposition - Should offer features for document management, including electronic filing - Must support case scheduling and calendar management - Should enable communication between court staff and legal representatives - Must provide reporting and analytics capabilities to track case progress - Not just for case documentation; must also improve operational efficiency in court processes.