Latka logo

Quan Alternatives & Competitors

The closest alternatives to Quan are Happl, Windmill and PullRequest. Quan generates $2.7M in revenue with 18 employees. Every one of the 20 alternatives below is compared with Quan on revenue, funding, customers, team size and founding year.

Quan at a glance

Revenue
$2.7M
Team size
18
Founded
2020

Quan vs its top alternatives

Quan is pinned as the first column so every figure is read against it. Blank cells are figures we have not verified, never zeros.

Quan compared with its top alternatives on revenue, funding, customers and team size
CompanyQuan logoQuanThis companyHappl logoHapplWindmill logoWindmillPullRequest logoPullRequestHappl logoHapplFrontliners logoFrontlinersFrontliners logoFrontlinersAwesome Group logoAwesome GroupAwesome Group logoAwesome GroupAwesome Group logoAwesome Group
Revenue$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M
Funding raisedNot disclosedNot disclosedNot disclosed$12.7MNot disclosedNot disclosedNot disclosedNot disclosedNot disclosedNot disclosed
CustomersNot disclosedNot disclosedNot disclosed1KNot disclosedNot disclosedNot disclosedNot disclosedNot disclosedNot disclosed
Team size18181823181010777
Founded2020202020222017202020172017201320132013
HQThe Hague, NetherlandsUnited KingdomFranceUnited StatesUnited KingdomDenmarkDenmarkSwedenSwedenSweden

Top Team Collaboration Software companies similar to Quan

PullRequest logo

3. PullRequest

United States · Team Collaboration Software

Provider of a web-based code reviewing platform created to automate & simplify the code review process. The company's code reviewing platform takes care of finding code review experts, who can check for bugs, security…

PullRequest revenue & fundingQuan vs PullRequest

Revenue
$2.7M
Funding
$12.7M
Customers
1K
Team size
23
Frontliners logo

5. Frontliners

Denmark · Team Collaboration Software

Provider of a platform intended to increase sales. The company's platform offer workforce management solution, staff overview, performance match, scheduling, training and motivation tool, enabling business to improve…

Frontliners revenue & fundingQuan vs Frontliners

Revenue
$2.7M
Team size
10
Frontliners logo

6. Frontliners

Denmark · Team Collaboration Software

Provider of a platform intended to increase sales. The company's platform offer workforce management solution, staff overview, performance match, scheduling, training and motivation tool, enabling business to improve…

Frontliners revenue & fundingQuan vs Frontliners

Revenue
$2.7M
Team size
10
Awesome Group logo

7. Awesome Group

Sweden · Team Collaboration Software

Developer of a cloud-based platform designed to create long-term commitment and loyalty in an organization. The company's The company's leadership and employees engagement tool is used in training leadership and…

Awesome Group revenue & fundingQuan vs Awesome Group

Revenue
$2.7M
Team size
7
Awesome Group logo

8. Awesome Group

Sweden · Team Collaboration Software

Developer of a cloud-based platform designed to create long-term commitment and loyalty in an organization. The company's The company's leadership and employees engagement tool is used in training leadership and…

Awesome Group revenue & fundingQuan vs Awesome Group

Revenue
$2.7M
Team size
7
Awesome Group logo

9. Awesome Group

Sweden · Team Collaboration Software

Developer of a cloud-based platform designed to create long-term commitment and loyalty in an organization. The company's The company's leadership and employees engagement tool is used in training leadership and…

Awesome Group revenue & fundingQuan vs Awesome Group

Revenue
$2.7M
Team size
7
Qbix logo

12. Qbix

United States · Team Collaboration Software

Provider of an online group activity coordination platform. The company helps in empowering groups of people to communicate unite communities.

Qbix revenue & fundingQuan vs Qbix

Revenue
$2.7M
Funding
$429K
Team size
14
Qbix logo

13. Qbix

United States · Team Collaboration Software

Provider of an online group activity coordination platform. The company helps in empowering groups of people to communicate unite communities.

Qbix revenue & fundingQuan vs Qbix

Revenue
$2.7M
Funding
$429K
Team size
14
Plaace logo

16. Plaace

Norway · Team Collaboration Software

Plaace helps retail property owners, tenants, and brokers to define strategies, match candidates, and collaborate through data analytics.

Plaace revenue & fundingQuan vs Plaace

Revenue
$2.7M
Funding
$3.1M
Team size
24
Field Buddy logo

19. Field Buddy

Netherlands · Team Collaboration Software

Empower your employees to deliver great field service. FieldBuddy ensures the highest levels of efficiency from your technicians and engineers, while exceeding your customers' expectations. FieldBuddy provides…

Field Buddy revenue & fundingQuan vs Field Buddy

Revenue
$2.7M
Team size
17
SKYSITE logo

20. SKYSITE

United States · Team Collaboration Software

SKYSITE's document management modules for construction projects, facilities management, and document archiving increase your productivity, reduce your risk and maximize collaboration. Together, and throughout a…

SKYSITE revenue & fundingQuan vs SKYSITE

Revenue
$2.7M
Customers
100K
Team size
15

Quan vs the Team Collaboration Software market

Quan ranks #627 of 2,459 Team Collaboration Software companies by annual revenue, putting it in the top 25% of the market.

Companies tracked
2,459
Median revenue
$1.3M
Median funding
$4.4M
Median team size
10

Quan competitors FAQ

What companies are similar to Quan?

The closest alternatives to Quan are Happl, Windmill and PullRequest, all active in Team Collaboration Software. This page compares each of them with Quan on revenue, funding, customers and team size.

What is the best alternative to Quan?

Happl is the closest alternative to Quan, generating $2.7M in revenue. Which alternative fits best depends on budget and company size, so compare all 20 alternatives above before choosing.

How much revenue does Quan generate?

Quan generates $2.7M in revenue.

Is Quan bigger than Happl?

Quan and Happl both generate $2.7M in revenue.