Latka logo

Top 5 Peer Code Review Software Companies With $1M–$5M Revenue (September 2026)

As of September 2026, Latka tracks 5 peer code review software companies with $1M–$5M in annual revenue. They have combined revenues of $8.1M and employ 44 people. They have raised $18.3M and serve 1K customers combined.

Every company below sells peer code review software to other businesses and is ranked by its most recent annual revenue. Revenue, funding, headcount and customer figures come from CEO interviews on the Latka podcast, public company filings, and Latka estimates where a company has not disclosed a number.

What Peer Code Review Software Companies do

Peer code review software facilitates the process of examining and evaluating code written by developers within a team. This type of software is primarily used to enhance code quality, identify bugs, and ensure adherence to coding standards by enabling collaborative reviews among peers. The typical workflow involves developers submitting their code changes which are then reviewed by colleagues, allowing for constructive feedback and knowledge sharing.

Companies
5
Revenue
$8.1M
Funding
$18.3M
Employees
44

Filters

Sorting: Highest -> Lowest

Filters

Top Peer Code Review Software Companies With $1M–$5M Revenue

Showing 5 of 5 companies ranked by annual revenue.

1PullRequest logo
PullRequest

Austin, Texas, United States

Provider of a web-based code reviewing platform created to automate & simplify the code review process. The company's code reviewing platform takes care of finding code review experts, who can check for bugs, security issues, coding standards and performance problems and then reviews the codes, enabling development teams ship code faster with improved quality and at a lower cost.

Revenue
$2.7M
Customers
1K
Year founded
2017
Funding
$12.7M
Team size
23
2Codeball logo
Codeball

Stockholm, Sweden

AI-Powered Code Review

Revenue
$2M
Year founded
2020
Team size
3
3CodeStream logo
CodeStream

New York, New York, United States

Provider of a cloud-based online coding platform intended to help developer teams to discuss, review and understand code. The company's platform makes it easy for teams of any size to build, share and retain knowledge about their codebase, enabling developers to build their code easier to change and faster to market.

Revenue
$1.2M
Year founded
2017
Funding
$5.6M
Team size
5
4hoop.dev logo
hoop.dev

São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil

Code review for DevOps tasks

Revenue
$1.2M
Year founded
2020
Team size
8
5CodeAnt AI logo
CodeAnt AI

San Francisco, California, United States

AI Code Reviewer

Revenue
$1M
Year founded
2023
Team size
5

Frequently asked questions about Peer Code Review Software Companies With $1M–$5M Revenue

How many peer code review software companies with $1M–$5M in annual revenue are there?

Latka tracks 5 peer code review software companies with $1M–$5M in annual revenue. Together they generate $8.1M in annual revenue and employ 44 people.

Which peer code review software company with $1M–$5M in annual revenue is the largest?

PullRequest is the largest, with $2.7M in annual revenue, founded in 2017.

How much revenue does a typical peer code review software company with $1M–$5M in annual revenue make?

The average peer code review software company in this list makes $1.6M a year, across 5 companies with reported revenue. They serve 1K customers combined.

Who are the leading Peer Code Review software vendors with $1M–$5M in annual revenue?

Ranked by annual revenue, the leaders are PullRequest, Codeball, CodeStream, hoop.dev and CodeAnt AI.

How much funding have peer code review software companies with $1M–$5M in annual revenue raised?

The 5 peer code review software companies with $1M–$5M in annual revenue tracked here have raised $18.3M in disclosed funding between them.

Related Development Software categories

Inclusion Criteria

- The software must enable multiple developers to review and comment on code changes. - It should provide functionalities for inline commenting and discussion threads related to specific code sections. - The tool must support version control integration to track code changes effectively. - It should include features for approval and merging to help manage the code submission process. - Not just for code review; must also facilitate code analysis to identify potential bugs or vulnerabilities.